Monday, February 28, 2011

J-2X Progress: Engine Assembly Starts!

By William Greene, MSFC

Ready…
Set…
Go!!!

After so many requirements reviews and concept reviews and safety reviews and design reviews, and after so many trade studies and analyses and assessments, and after so much paperwork generation and processing, and after so many programmatic meetings and technical interchanges and integration exchanges and formal boards, after all that, we have finally begun assembling the very first J-2X, Engine 10001, at the NASA Stennis Space Center (SSC) in Building 9101.

In the end, truly, it all comes to this: the hardware.  Everything that we do – and it is an astonishing amount of work – comes down to an operational piece of space launch hardware, a rocket engine (albeit a development unit first example).  It is sometimes quite easy to forget that fact after being buried in the mountains of necessary details for several years.  Yet that day has now arrived.

The Main Combustion Element (MCE), consisting of the Main Combustion Chamber (MCC) and the Main Injector (MI) mated together, arrived at NASA on 22 February 2011.  While a number of piece parts and components have been arriving at SSC for weeks, it is the arrival of this sub-assembly that marks the start of assembly.  It would not be too much of stretch to say that the rest of the engine, one way or another, hangs off the MCE.  So you need that part to get the whole process started in earnest.

The drawing below shows the first steps in stacking the whole thing together.


Your first question should be, "What's a Birdcage?"  It’s actually a simulator for the nozzle.  Because this is the first build of the engine and because the various components are not completing fabrication in the optimal sequence, we have found ways to expedite engine assembly such as the use of this nozzle simulator.  The whole engine will be stacked and assembled with the Birdcage acting as the effective pedestal for the process.  Then, when the nozzle does arrive, the assembled upper part of the engine will be lifted, the Birdcage will be removed, and then the assembled pieces will be lowered onto the actual nozzle assembly to be used for Engine 10001.  Below is a photograph of the actual Birdcage sitting in its packing box at NASA SSC.
(Now, I'm not going to burst anyone's bubble, but whoever first started calling this thing a "Birdcage" perhaps has a frightening impression of how large are the birds of southern Mississippi.  Those are some awfully large holes.)  Later, the Birdcage will be reused as the structural foundation for the assembly of the J-2X PowerPack Assembly to be tested next year.

The next picture is of the assembly area where the whole thing will be brought together.  There is a raised floor on which the technicians will stand and there is a recessed area where the dolly will fit on which the engine is assembled.  On the silvery metal carts shown – the so-called "bread carts" – the kits will be laid out for the next stage of assembly as the engine comes together.
One interesting little note about that picture of the assembly area is that in the upper left-hand corner you can see another engine within a big yellow piece of ground support equipment.  That is an RS-68 engine that flies on the Delta IV vehicle.  The J-2X assembly area sits right next to the RS-68 assembly area though they are distinctly separated.

Here are some other really cool pics:
Okay, so maybe "really cool" is a slight exaggeration.  On the left is a corner of the kit staging area where, on a pallet in the back (can you see it?), sits the first pre-arranged kit of engine parts to arrive at NASA SSC.  On the right are the two turbopumps for Engine 10001 still sitting in their shipping crates.  Trust me, as the assembly process moves forward, the pictures will get better.  Really.

So, J-2X is coming together.  Over the next several weeks, I will be posting pictures and descriptions of the process.  I do have to say, from a personal perspective, seeing this thing finally becoming a reality is quite gratifying.  Thank you all for coming along and sharing the ride.

Friday, February 25, 2011

Live Chat Roundup: February 24, 2011

By Jim Gerard, NASA INSPIRE Education Specialist, KSC, FL

As the Space Shuttle rises from its launch pad into the Florida afternoon sky, a cheer rises from the thousands gathered to witness the power and spectacle of the event.  A second cheer arises as the Orbiter detaches from its booster to continue its way into space.  A third cheer erupts minutes later as the booster flies overhead, with the mighty roar of jet engines drowning out the crowd as it makes its way to the landing strip. Whoa!  The booster flies back?  In the early design concepts of the Space Shuttle it did!  How the Shuttle evolved in design to the current configuration was the subject of last night's Live Chat which I had the pleasure to present to 61 members of the INSPIRE Online Learning Community.

We had lots of questions, and I was unable to get to them all.  Here are the questions (and answers!) from last night:

Q.  Regarding your "What's Next" slide...Why are we stopping the space shuttle four years from the planned deorbit of the ISS (keeping in mind political threats)?  In addition, if NASA hopes to continue manned missions, why is it eliminating the two initial and necessary steps for the developement of anything further: LEO and the space shuttle?
A.  When President Bush announced the Vision for Space Exploration in 2005, the idea was to build new launchers and spacecraft (Constellations) to service the ISS, build a Moon base, and travel to Mars.  The funds for that would come from the elimination of the Space Shuttle, which was a large part of the NASA budget.  Though Constellation was canceled, the cost savings of eliminating the Shuttle will be diverted to other programs, including the development of a Multi-Purpose Crewed Vehicle (Orion) that could be launched commercially.  NASA is also seeking out and spurring on commercial crewed vehicles like SpaceShipTwo and Dragon.  Oh, and the ISS will remain active until 2020.


Q. Is it possible to make a shuttle or rocket land like a helicopter?
A. Yes, but it was not NASA that accomplished it.  A small company called Rotary Rocket designed a test article called the Roton that would take off with rockets and then descend and land using a retractable rotor.  Read more at http://www.astronautix.com/craft/roton.htm


Q. How long did it take for NASA to come up with the shuttle design?
A. Official work began by NASA in 1968, but it was not until 1972 when NASA chose the North American (Rockwell) proposed configuration.  Changes continued until the first Shuttle flight in 1981.


Q. When the shuttle was launched today, it appeared that something fell off like maybe foam.  Do you forsee any problems with that?
A.  Foam from the External Tank was seen falling after the critical phase of flight.  Launch video will be examined.  Astronauts took video and images of the ET after separation that will also be analyzed.
You can hear more questions, answers and the rest of the presentation in the Live Chat Archives beginning on Monday.  Thanks to all the students who attended!

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Poll of the Week: Steely-eyed Rocket Persons

By Jim Gerard, NASA INSPIRE Education Specialist, KSC, FL


Ask people what NASA does and you're sure to get an answer like "launch rockets" (or some variant).  Indeed, launching rockets allows NASA to send people and payloads to space - it is a means rather than the end.  This weeks Poll asked Online Learning Community members whether they have built and launched a rocket.  Specifically a model rocket.  Being a model does not make them less a technological device than the boosters used by NASA and the military - they are models in size, but not in function.  As a matter of fact, the typical model rocket has the exact same launch profile as the NASA rockets.  Compare these sketches of a model rocket and NASA's first manned spaceflight:

Model Rocket Flight Profile
Mercury-Redstone Flight Profile
It appears the majority of OLC has had a chance to build an launch a rocket.  Rockets of every kind, as well.  Here is what some had to say on the Discussion Board:
I've launched many a rocket. I have used nice cardboard one tht I made at USSRC and it almost landed on the roof of my brother's school when I used a C Estes engine (I was launching in the parking lot of his school. It was great.) When I lauched  Two-stage rocket, its nose got buried in the ground (launched at USSRC). :/
***
I launch rockets every chance I get. Most I design myself, but I also have launched common bottle rockets and store bought make it yourself rocket kits, though those aren't as much fun. My favorite rocket launch though was last summer when I launched a water rocket. (My design). It flew through my brother's open window and exploded, splashing water all over him and his cat at about 7 AM. :D
I also designed and launched an underwater rocket by using an air pump, (above the water surface), to pressurize the air tank and launch the rocket from the bottom of the swimming pool. It got about 15 ft. or so, pretty good for an underwater launch.
***
I don't get to do much during the year but every Christmas my uncles, dad, and I all build our own rocket and we go out to the local baseball field and launch them until we either lose them or run out of engines/fuses/batteries for the spark generator.
***
I launched a store-bought rocket in 6th grade science class, but my group put the tail fins on backward, so it never flew in the right direction.  We launched it twice before it got stuck in a tree.  I've also launched bottle rockets and paper "air-rockets."
 This week, we look at NASA's new vision statement: "To reach for new heights and reveal the unknown so that what we do and learn will benefit all humankind.".  What do you think of it?  Answer the poll on the home page, then support your decision on the Discussion Board.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Let's Roll!

By Angela Storey, MSFC, AL

On Feb. 17 NASA announced the roster of teams set to compete April 1-2 at the 18th annual NASA Great Moonbuggy Race -- and the race season is officially under way!

Ezra Logreira, left, and Karine Wittenborg, moonbuggy racers from the Huntsville
Center for Technology, are geared up for this year's Great Moonbuggy Race.
(MSFC/David Higginbotham)
Ezra Logreira, left, and Karine Wittenborg, moonbuggy racers from the Huntsville
Center for Technology, are geared up for this year's Great Moonbuggy Race.
(MSFC/David Higginbotham)

A total of 84 student teams have registered to roll out their wheeled wonders at the U.S. Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, Ala. They include U.S. high school, college and university students from 22 states and Puerto Rico; and international challengers from six countries, including -- for the first time -- racers from Ethiopia, Pakistan and Russia. For the complete list of 2011 teams, visit http://moonbuggy.msfc.nasa.gov.

Every year, the NASA Great Moonbuggy Race challenges students to design, build and race lightweight, human-powered rovers -- tackling some of the same engineering challenges overcome by Apollo-era lunar rover developers at the Marshall Center in the late 1960s.

"This project engages the aerospace talent of tomorrow in hands-on engineering," said Dr. Frank Six, Marshall's university affairs officer and one of the race founders. "They learn by doing."

This year's race has a special historic impact -- 40 years ago, the first NASA Lunar Roving Vehicle was used on the surface of the moon. NASA's historic lunar rover made its inaugural excursion July 31, 1971, driven by Apollo 15 astronauts David Scott and James Irwin. Two more rovers followed in 1972, during the Apollo 16 and Apollo 17 missions.

Four decades later, moonbuggy racers strive to uphold the legacy of that engineering feat. Their challenge is to deliver a two-driver vehicle capable of posting the fastest vehicle assembly and race times, while incurring the fewest penalties on a course that simulates the harsh lunar surface. High school students square off in one division; college and university teams compete in another.

Race organizers expect another heated contest this year. But Six said he also looks forward to that special "moonbuggy camaraderie" on and off the course -- a hallmark of the event which transcends region, ethnicity and even language barriers.

"Students hailing from four continents come together in friendly competition," he said. "More importantly, they come to meet one another, to compare ideas and turn shared dreams of spaceflight into lasting friendships and future partnerships."

NASA will broadcast live race coverage via NASA TV and the online Webcasting service UStream. In 2010, more than 32,000 people around the world watched live coverage, including commentary from race organizers and chats with student racers.

Race enthusiasts also can track race news on Facebook at http://www.facebook.com/moonbuggyrace, and keep up with real-time Twitter updates during the race at http://twitter.com/moonbuggyrace.

Friday, February 18, 2011

Live Chat Roundup: February 17, 2011

By Jim Gerard, NASA INSPIRE Education Specialist, KSC, FL

What blew out every window of Mississippi's Stennis Space Center?  Was it Hurricane Katrina in 2005?  No, it was when they did a full test of a Saturn V first stage with 5 F-1 engines going full blast in 1966.  56 INSPIRE community members heard this and other facts about SSC last night from DLN Coordinator Kelly Witherspoon.  Dr. Witherspoon talked about the main mission of SSC - to test rocket engines - as well as some of the other agencies that reside in this 'federal city'.  Located close to the Gulf of Mexico in southern Mississippi, SSC provides a stopping point between the Michoud construction plant in Louisiana and Kennedy Space center in Florida to test the rockets that take humans to space.  There was an old saying around the community,"If you want to go to the moon, you first have to go through Hancock County, Miss."

Today, test stands are used to prepare for future rockets.  The RS-68 engine used on the Delta IV booster are even constructed there by Pratt & Whitney.  You will also find the largest concentration of oceanographers anywhere in the world at the Naval Meteorology and Oceanography Command.   You can check it all out by visiting the StenniSphere, SSC's visitor center, accessible from the Welcome Station on eastbound I-10.

Next week I'll be providing a presentation on the History of the Space Shuttle.  Sign-up begins Monday afternoon on the Discussion Board.  See you then!

Thursday, February 17, 2011

J-2X Extra: Shiny Metal Pieces

By William Greene, MSFC, AL


Finally, it has been discovered: Proof that rocket engineers can indeed have a sense of humor.  This is an exchange that actually happened in a meeting here at NASA not too long ago.

Manager #1: What are those feedlines made of?
Manager #2: Really shiny metal.

Translation: He didn't know, but he would find out.  Okay, so it’s not Saturday Night Live material, but it was funny in context.  (You had to be there…really.)

The truth is that we use lots and lots of different kinds of shiny metal in all kinds of strange shapes, under all kinds of severe conditions, and with uncompromising standards against failure.  We use aluminum and steel and titanium and copper alloys and nickel-based super alloys and, sometimes, rare earth metals and precious metals.  We cast it, forge it, roll it, spin it, weld it, you name it.  Suffice it to say that if you like or know something about metal working or machining or welding or metallurgy, then even if you haven't got a clue about rockets, we’ve probably still got a place for you.  It's a fascinating field that ranges from enormous factory tooling necessary for large structures production all of the way down to microscopic crystal formations deep within the parts being produced.

Now, the pursuit of new technology demonstrations has never been a primary objective for the J-2X development effort.  We are supposed to make it work – that’s the prime directive.  However, in the course of J-2X development, we came across a situation where we were forced to consider innovative solutions and, from that consideration, identified an opportunity to pursue something really pretty cool and it has to do with shiny metal.


So let's start at the beginning.  In order to avoid combustion instabilities in the gas generator assembly, we found that we needed a very short gas generator discharge duct.  What is a combustion instability?  In this case, think of a pipe organ.  The size of the pipe determines the pitch.  Big pipes make big booming sounds.  Little pipes make little whistling sounds.  What we found through component testing was that the pipe connected to the gas generator was acting like a pipe from a pipe organ and the sound was so big and so loud that it had the potential of ripping the whole thing apart.  To find a place where we were de-tuned from the booming loud vibrations, we had to make the pipe quite short. 




Now, though, we had a problem.  We had a duct so short that it basically looks like a U as pictured in the drawing above.  Note, however, that the unit used on the engine is welded on one end and flanged on the other.   This picture is a drawing of the test configuration.  But regardless of the flanges and such on the ends, this part is basically U made out of very high-strength "shiny metal" (a nickel-based super alloy).  Given the diameter of the tube, the strength of the metal, the thickness of the walls, and the fact that we can't allow the walls to get too thin from bending, we had a devil of a manufacturing situation for what looks like, on the surface, a relatively simple component.  So, we (and that's the big "we" of both NASA and our prime contractor, "Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne") started looking for solutions.

Below is a picture of the baseline solution illustrated with a manufacturing demonstration unit.  Rather than trying to do the whole bend in one piece, it is done in three pieces, each with a 60-degree piece of the overall 180-degree bend.  Those three pieces are then welded together; the end pieces are trimmed back; and the flange is welded on the end.  It works.  But it is labor intensive with all that welding and with all of work that comes along with welding along the lines of inspections and re-work cycles.  To give you an idea of size here, the duct is 3.5 inches in diameter so it is a healthy hunk of metal.



Now comes the really interesting part.

In addition to the baseline solution, another solution was proposed.  It's called "Direct Metal Laser Sintering" or DMLS.  The company that does this is called Morris Technologies (look them up!).  And, like most high-tech stuff, if I knew the nitty-gritty details I wouldn't be able to share them, but I can tell you the basics.  First, you start with a whole bunch of very fine metal powder.  Next, you load into the computer your three-dimensional CAD model for the part you want to make.  The CAD model is analytically cut into thousands of horizontal slices.  Then, in a special, automated chamber, a thin layer of metal powder is laid out and fused by a laser into the shape of the first slice of from your CAD model.  Then another layer of powder and fused slice is added, and then another, and then another.  With each slice, a layer of powder is laid out and fused to the previous layer precisely duplicating your CAD model a little bit at a time.  So, any shape that can be decomposed into and built up from a series of thin layers can be made.  Below is a picture of a small pump impeller with a relatively complex geometry that was made by Morris Technologies using this process.



Ignoring how it works, you’ve got this:  you put in your computer model; you put in the powder; come back a week later; and, your part is cooked (actually there are post-process surface finishing operations, but that's just a minor detail).  It’s almost like something from The Jetsons cartoon series.

So, we asked, can you make our U-shaped tube?  The answer was: almost.  The size limitations of the existing chamber dictated that we could do the whole tube part but the flanges would have to be welded on.  Still, it's a pretty good demonstration.  Below, you can see a couple of pictures of the finished part.


But that's not the end.  So, we made a fancy pipe.  Big deal.

Here is the big deal: making it was very cheap and very fast.  Of course, cheap isn't always helpful if the thing doesn’t work.  So, we have to prove that it works.  Towards that end, we are performing materials properties tests on samples made in the chamber simultaneously with the duct, we are doing non-destructive evaluations of the duct itself, and we plan to incorporate it into a component level test series of the workhorse gas generator.  Below is a kind of creepy picture of the duct after it was inspected for tiny flaws using a fluorescent penetrant solution and ultra-violet light. 

Because of the severe environments that this duct will see, the material properties throughout the duct have to be consistently good.  There can't be any flaws on the surface that could lead to the development of cracks.  So far, the piece has come through all of the inspections with flying colors.  The next step will be actual hot-fire testing.  Below is a photograph of previous testing of the workhorse gas generator.
If everything goes well and post-test inspections show that the part did not sustain damage, we will have taken a huge step towards making this fabrication approach viable for not only this particular piece of the J-2X engine, but for all kinds of parts on all rocket engines in the future.  There are technology issues to overcome – notably current limitations on the size of the parts to be made – but this process is potentially an order of magnitude improvement in terms of the costs for building complex, severe environment components out of that ubiquitous substance that we've got all over in a rocket engine, i.e., "shiny metal."

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Help Kids Appreciate STEM

By Connor Shea, 9th Grade INSPIRE Student

I've been fortunate enough to grow up with an appreciation for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics.  My parents noticed my interest in math early on and provided interesting math books for me to read such as The Number Devil, Mathematicians Are People Too, and G is for Googol.  I was encouraged to explore my interest in geology by working on a project with a mentor when I was ten.  Trips to science museums and nature walks have been regular events. As I have grown older, I have realized that a lot of kids see math and the other STEM disciplines as "hard" or "boring". They might not have had the same opportunities to see how exciting STEM can be. I decided that I wanted to help kids appreciate STEM fields and learn more about the fun parts.

As part of this endeavor, I've presented Zome Tools engineering workshops to kids at the Beyond IQ Conference, Cub Scout groups, and afterschool programs. I launched my blog, STEM4Kids in September of 2010.  Stem4Kids.info is a free site dedicated to helping kids ages 8-12 learn about STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics).  On this site, I post fun STEM games, articles, and activities that I find for others to enjoy. I also post on twitter and will be creating a Facebook account for STEM4Kids.

(You can write for the INSPIRE Blog!  Upload your article to the OLC Blogs drop box!)